Skip to main content
Category

Cinema

Evil Dead Burn

Evil Dead Burn

By Cinema

Evil Dead Burn

Earlier this year cinema goers were hit with the gory onslaught that was Lee Cronin’s The Mummy. Anyone that saw it would probably be thinking that it would be difficult to see any horror film out doing it this year when it came to look away moments and fake blood used. Well stand back and get ready because Evil Dead Burn has just entered the conversation.

Without heading too far into spoiler territory one of the film’s links to Evil Dead Rise is exposed very early on when two lake fisherman find themselves coming into contact with a Deadite. That Deadite then finds itself involved in an accident with William (George Pullar – Moon Rock For Monday) who is angrily driving away from an argument with his wife Alice (Souheila Yacoub – Dune: Part Two) whom he accuses of flirting with his brother, Joseph (Hunter Doohan – Wednesday).

The accident results in the death of William and as his family gathers for his funeral there is high tension amongst the Price family. Alice is convinced that her parents-in-law, Edgar (Erroll Shand – Wolfram) and Susan (Tandi WrightPearl), hate her while Joseph knows that his father thinks he is a failure. Added to that is the fact that dementia has ruined the mind of the family’s Grandmother (Maude Davey – The Dry) who is convinced that Joseph’s wife Thya (Luciane Buchanan – Chief Of War).

The suspicion and hatred within the family then only intensifies when William rises at the funeral and makes Edgar a Deadite hellbent on finding an ancient, mystical dagger that he believes Joseph has in his possession.

Directed by Sebastian Vanicek (Infested) Evil Dead Burn is one of those films that has a great set-up but never really reaches the heights that it could have. A shame when you consider the opening sequence with the fishermen looks brilliant with cinematographer Philip Lozano (Redemption Day) being extremely creative with his shots.

Evil Dead BurnThat all falls away though once the Price family storyline starts and sadly so does the genius of the plot. The lore behind the evil at hand that has established in previous Evil Dead films seems to be forgotten while the interesting storyline of William and Joseph’s Grandfather being an expert on the evil itself and how to stop it is never fully explored the way it should be. It is perhaps one of the most interesting elements of the film but it never explored or used the way it should be.

Instead, screenwriters Vanicek and Florent Bemard (Infested) focus on making this a family-fuelled gore fest but even then have the audience scratching their heads over moments such as when the clearly infected Edgar begins frothing at the mouth at the dinner table but nobody reacts or even says anything. Even more strange is how calm some characters remain when he begins stabbing the family dog – it’s like in that moment the whole family loses their humanity.

The positive of Evil Dead Burn though is that you never get bored. The screenplay does at least allow for some creative ways for the Deadites to kill or maim their victims and the tense family dynamic adds to the suspense of the film both before and during the resulting kill spree. We’ve all had those awkward family gatherings so we know just how wrong an event like that can go even without the undead turning up.

Also, on the positive side of things here are the performances. Soulheila Yacoub is brilliant throughout and makes this movie her own. Likewise, Erroll Shand backs up his recent gritty performance in Wolfram by at times feeling like evil incarnated her in Evil Dead Burns. It really is time for Hollywood to realise just how talented Shand is and give him more recognition.

Evil Dead Burn is one of those films that promises so much but just never delivers. The filmmakers try to get serious and explore deep themes like domestic abuse but they let that all slip away by letting all the important elements of the film slip away while they try to turn into a complete gorefest. The result is a film that just never reaches the heights it could of.

Director Robert Eggers, photographed at the Four Seasons Hotel Los Angeles in November. (Marcus Ubungen / Los Angeles Times)

Robert Eggers and the Occult: Fascination Without Devotion

By Cinema

Few modern filmmakers have become as closely associated with the occult as Robert Eggers. His films are filled with witches, pagan rituals, ancient gods, folklore, demons, curses, and supernatural forces that feel unnervingly authentic. Whether it is the Black Phillip of The Witch, the mystical visions of The Northman, or the dark symbolism of Nosferatu, Eggers has developed a reputation for presenting the occult with a level of historical detail rarely seen in contemporary cinema.

This has naturally led many viewers to wonder whether his fascination extends beyond filmmaking. Is Robert Eggers personally involved in the occult, or is he simply an obsessive researcher with an extraordinary eye for historical authenticity?

The evidence suggests the latter.

I find it impossible to watch a Robert Eggers film without feeling like I’ve stumbled into a history book that should have remained sealed. For me, he’s the only filmmaker who truly understands that the occult isn’t just a collection of jump scares or CGI effects; it’s a living, breathing weight of the past.

A Historian First, Filmmaker Second

Honestly, I think the reason Robert Eggers’ films land so hard is that he’s basically an archivist who happens to make horror movies. Before he was a director, he was a production designer and a theater guy, and you can really tell. He doesn’t care about modern horror jump scares or tired tropes. He cares about whether the buttons on a coat from 1600 are historically accurate. It sounds boring until you realize that his obsession with getting the furniture, the dialect, and the superstitions right is exactly what pulls you into his world.

What I love about his approach is that he doesn’t try to force our modern perspective onto his characters. He isn’t interested in making a movie about “what if” a witch was real. He is interested in the fact that people actually believed in witches with every fiber of their being. He gets inside their heads, and because he treats their fears like absolute fact, the horror on screen feels terrifyingly grounded. He’s not telling a ghost story to freak us out. He’s showing us how scary the world used to be for the people who really lived in it.

The Witch and the Reality of Seventeenth Century Fear

When The Witch hit theaters in 2015, it blew me away because it felt like nothing else in the horror genre. Most filmmakers try to invent their own spooky mythology, but Eggers took a completely different path. He practically lived in old Puritan journals, colonial court records, and period sermons to get the vibe right. You can tell, too. Some of the most unsettling parts of that movie are actually pulled straight from real, recorded accusations from the 1600s.

What I think really sells it is the dialogue. He reconstructed it using period-accurate English, which sounds daunting, but it totally works. It makes you feel like you are actually sitting in New England in the 1630s. It stops feeling like a horror movie and starts feeling like a window into a time when people truly, genuinely believed that Satan was hanging out in their backyard. The Devil in that film isn’t some CGI monster created for a jump scare. It is the exact, terrifying version of the Devil that a Puritan would have feared. It is brilliant.

Folklore Rather Than Fantasy

For me, the coolest thing about Robert Eggers is that he couldn’t care less about traditional fantasy tropes. He is all about folklore, and there is a massive difference. You can really see it in The Lighthouse, which is this wild, claustrophobic mix of maritime legends, Greek myths, and alchemy that just spirals into total madness. Most directors would feel the need to explain those mysteries, but Eggers refuses to do that. He just lets the myths exist alongside the characters, and it makes the whole thing feel much more surreal and dangerous.

Then you have The Northman, which takes that same commitment and applies it to the Viking world. He went to crazy lengths to get the details right. He actually hired archaeologists and historians for the production because he wanted the seiðr rituals, the Valkyries, and Odin to feel like they were part of a real spiritual reality, not just cool visual effects. He treats that stuff with so much respect. In his hands, the supernatural never feels like window dressing. It feels like the actual air his characters are breathing. That is why I think he is one of the only guys working today who really gets that folklore should be lived in, not just observed from a distance.

Researching the Occult

The biggest reason Robert Eggers puts other horror directors to shame is the sheer, obsessive amount of homework he does. This is not just surface-level research for him. He spends years burying himself in dusty manuscripts, old religious texts, and dense folklore studies long before a single camera starts rolling. Most filmmakers just recycle the same lazy horror clichés because it is the path of least resistance. He refuses to go down that route. He is busy reconstructing how people actually thought hundreds of years ago, and that changes the entire game.

That level of dedication is why his movies feel so hauntingly real. I see people online all the time who watch his work and assume he must be some kind of occultist who truly believes in these demons and curses. I think that is a complete misunderstanding of his process. He is not making a documentary about his own personal faith. He is just a massive nerd for history who happens to be a genius filmmaker. He does not need to believe in these superstitions for them to be terrifying on screen. He just needs to understand exactly what the people who did believe in them were afraid of. That is why he is at the top of his field..

What Eggers Has Actually Said

I see people guessing about what Eggers actually believes all the time, but he has been pretty clear about it if you know where to look. In that New Yorker profile, he admitted something super interesting. He said he has a genuine fear of surrendering to the occult. He has met plenty of real witches and practitioners, and he thinks their perspectives are fascinating, but he knows exactly where to draw the line.

Making movies is his way of exploring those dark places from a safe distance. He gets to stare into the abyss, but he does not have to jump in. That is a crucial distinction. We really need to stop assuming that being curious about the supernatural is the same thing as being a true believer. Artists have been diving into religion, mythology, and the dark stuff for centuries without signing up for the belief system themselves. He is just doing what great artists have always done.

Is Robert Eggers an Occultist?

Despite years of speculation from fans, there is no credible evidence that Robert Eggers belongs to any occult organisation, magical order or esoteric society.

Likewise, there is no indication that he identifies as a Satanist or has any formal connection with the Church of Satan.

His work certainly reflects an admiration for historical occult traditions, but admiration for historical subjects is not the same as personal practice.

Eggers appears to approach the occult much as a historian approaches ancient civilizations. He studies them thoroughly, respects their complexity and attempts to represent them honestly.

Why His Films Appeal to Satanists

Although Eggers has never identified with Satanism publicly, many members of the Church of Satan and other Left Hand Path communities have embraced his work.

One reason is his refusal to reduce Satan, witches or pagan traditions to simplistic monsters.

Instead, he presents them within their historical and cultural contexts, allowing audiences to understand why people feared, worshipped or condemned them.

That intellectual honesty resonates with viewers who appreciate history over sensationalism.

His films encourage audiences to question inherited assumptions rather than simply accepting traditional religious narratives.

Nosferatu and Occult Symbolism

Eggers’ adaptation of Nosferatu continues this pattern.

The original 1922 production carried subtle connections to early twentieth century occult thought through producer and designer Albin Grau, who had genuine interests in ceremonial magic and esoteric philosophy.

Eggers researched those influences while developing his own version, preserving much of the atmosphere without turning the film into an occult manifesto.

Once again, history informed the art.

The Power of Belief

Perhaps the most interesting aspect of Robert Eggers’ cinema is that belief itself often becomes the true subject of his films.

His characters live inside worlds where folklore shapes reality.

Whether the supernatural is objectively real often matters less than the fact that the characters believe it is.

That psychological approach gives his films an authenticity rarely achieved in horror cinema.

Fear becomes believable because the people experiencing it genuinely accept the existence of the forces confronting them.

Final Thoughts

Robert Eggers has become one of cinema’s foremost interpreters of folklore, witchcraft and historical occult traditions. His extraordinary commitment to research has produced films that feel immersive, intelligent and historically grounded.

Despite recurring speculation, there is no evidence that he personally practices occultism or belongs to any esoteric organisation. His own comments suggest he prefers to remain an observer rather than a participant.

For audiences interested in the history of magic, witchcraft and ancient belief systems, that distance may actually be one of his greatest strengths. It allows him to portray these traditions with curiosity, respect and remarkable authenticity while leaving viewers free to decide for themselves where history ends and mythology begins.

The Exorcist III: Legion

By Cinema

For years, it sat in that awkward little corner of horror history where certain films get dumped because nobody quite knows what to do with them. It wasn’t the original, obviously. Nothing is. And it sure as hell wasn’t Exorcist II: The Heretic, that bizarre fever accident of a film that still feels like somebody tried to make a religious sci-fi epic after eating bad seafood. The Exorcist III was the other one. The George C. Scott one. The hospital corridor one. The one horror fans whispered about like it was some half-buried secret.

Read More

Lee Cronin’s The Mummy

By Cinema

If you don’t like horrific and brutal horror films then stop reading right now because Lee Cronin’s The Mummy is not the film for you. I’ve seen some pretty confronting horror films over the years, some so full-on they have never become general releases in cinema, but I have to admit that I have rarely seen a horror film that has had me looking away from the screen as often as this film did.

Read More
Return To Silent Hill

Return To Silent Hill

By Cinema

In 2006 we saw the release of Silent Hill – a film based on a horror themed video game that had a legion of fans. While the reviews of the film were lukewarm the film quickly became a cult favourite and to this day is still listed on a lot of ‘Must See’ horror lists.

Read More
The Bride of Frankenstein

The Bride Of Frankenstein

By Cinema

The Bride of Frankenstein is one of those rare sequels that does not simply continue the original story. It sharpens it, twists it, and somehow becomes stranger, funnier, sadder, more elegant, and more emotionally dangerous than the film that came before it. Released in 1935 and directed by James Whale, it remains one of Universal Horror’s crown jewels, and arguably the finest film to come out of that entire classic monster cycle.

Read More

The Legend Of Bela Lugosi

By Cinema

Bela Lugosi was born Béla Ferenc Dezső Blaskó on October 20, 1882, in the small town of Lugos in the Kingdom of Hungary, now Lugoj in modern-day Romania. The town itself would later become inseparable from his identity, because “Lugosi” literally means “from Lugos.” Long before he became cinema’s most famous vampire, he came from a rigid, conservative household shaped by discipline, religion, and the social tensions of late 19th century Eastern Europe.

Read More
Late Night With The Devil

Late Night With The Devil

By Cinema

There’s a reason this one cut through the noise. On paper it sounds like a gimmick. A possessed girl goes on a 1970s talk show and chaos unfolds live on air. In practice it plays like something much stranger. It feels like a cursed broadcast that somehow slipped through time and landed intact.

Read More
Ready Or Not 2

Ready Or Not 2: Here I Come

By Cinema

In the 2019 a horror film landed that had fans of the genre in raptures. While it wasn’t expected to be one of the big hits of the year the arrival of Ready Or Not had people raving. Finally there was a horror film that had everything – twists, turns, action, gore and a few laughs along the way.

Read More

Whistle

By Cinema

Do you remember back in the 90s and the early 2000s where there were a bunch of horror movies hitting cinemas that were made for teenagers and younger horror fans? Even if you were older they were still enjoyable films.

Read More