Skip to main content
Tag

Horror Cinema

Lee Cronin’s The Mummy

By Cinema

Lee Cronin's The Mummy

If you don’t like horrific and brutal horror films then stop reading right now because Lee Cronin’s The Mummy is not the film for you. I’ve seen some pretty confronting horror films over the years, some so full-on they have never become general releases in cinema, but I have to admit that I have rarely seen a horror film that has had me looking away from the screen as often as this film did.

Before our deep dive into the film though let’s begin with the questions that most people have asked me about this film. Who the hell is Lee Cronin and why is his name in the title of the movie?

Decent questions because yes that honour is something normally only reserved for the likes of Steven Spielberg or James Cameron. But to answer the first question Lee Cronin is the person that brought us Evil Dead Rise and to answer the second – because Blumhouse Studios who made this film are trying to point out that this is Cronin’s version of The Mummy legend and has nothing to do with the Universal Monsters universe or the films starring Brendan Fraser.

Cronin’s The Mummy centres around an American family living and working in Egypt. The father, Charlie Cannon (Jack Reynor – Midsommar), is working as a television reporter while the mother, Larissa (Laia Costa – Only You), works as a nurse in a local hospital.

Their blissful lives are suddenly thrown into chaos when their daughter is kidnapped by a mysterious woman, known as The Magician (Hayat Kamille – Murder On The Orient Express). Charlie gives chase but a sand storm prevents him from catching up to them. Worse still the Police Unit investigating, which includes Detective Dalia Zaki (May Calamawy – Moon Knight), seems to think that Charlie is the prime suspect.

The story then picks up years later with Charlie, Larrisa and their other children, Sebastian (Shylo Molina – Deadly Illusions) and Maud (Billie Roy – Spirit Halloween) living with Larissa’s mother (Veronica Falcon – Jungle Cruise) back in the USA.

The family are fractured but suddenly receive good news – their missing daughter, Katie (Natalie Grace – Raymar), has been found alive. However, the happiness is short lived because when Katie is returned to them it is easy to see that she is disfigured and disturbed. Something is obviously horrifically wrong because she seems to want to cause pain and even death to all of those around her.

Lee Cronin’s The Mummy is one horror film that certainly doesn’t hold back any punches – this film is absolutely savage. Cronin’s screenplay basically uses the character of The Mummy to deliver a brilliantly written possession movie. And while most horror films these days seem to aim for a lower classification to boost audience numbers Cronin throws that playbook right out the window.

Nobody is safe in this film with the demon not caring whether it hurts children or even elderly women. People get hurt or meet grisly ends throughout this film and as you would expect that heightens the suspense that the film generates for the audience. Let’s be honest if they weren’t hiding their eyes behind a popcorn box then they would be sitting right on the edge of their seat.

Yes, there are some pretty gruesome scenes to sit through with his film – especially if you are like my wife and have issues with scenes depicting things like human finger and toenails. But to his credit Cronin hasn’t included those scenes just for the shock factor they do all play important parts when it comes to the plot.

In fact the only fault that I found with this film was that it felt that the suspicion on Charlie petered out fairly quickly – something that doesn’t happen in real life kidnapping cases. The screenplay does try to make up for that by allowing the audience to see scenes where Charlie and Larissa are basically blaming each other for Katie’s death, and while those scenes are well-written and dramatic it is not the same as law enforcement breathing down his neck. In fact the film is arguably stronger when the character of Detective Zaki is around so it is a shame that she goes missing for a huge chunk of the film.

When it comes to the acting performances the intensity of the film also plays a huge part. The child actors – Shylo Molina, Billie Roy and Natalie Grace – are all put through the ringer in their roles and to credit they deliver some truly remarkable performances. The star here though is Jack Reynor who throughout the films more dramatic scenes shows Hollywood that he is ready for leading man status.

Lee Cronin’s The Mummy is not always an easy film to watch but it needs to be praised for the fact that it is a horror film that doesn’t hold back. Cronin’s work here is creative and while the film is savage you do have to say that this is one of the most possession horrors to have surfaced in the last decade.

Return To Silent Hill

Return To Silent Hill

By Cinema

Return To Silent Hill

In 2006 we saw the release of Silent Hill – a film based on a horror themed video game that had a legion of fans. While the reviews of the film were lukewarm the film quickly became a cult favourite and to this day is still listed on a lot of ‘Must See’ horror lists.

Like was so often the case in the early 2000s a sequel was quickly put into production but something happened behind the scenes and director Christophe Gans exited the project. Eventually it was released under the title Silent Hill: Revelation with a different filmmaking team behind it. The film wasn’t well received and the Silent Hill franchise seemed to have been put to bed.

But now it has re-spawned with a new film and once again Gans has returned to the fold with the latest film in the franchise Return To Silent Hill. But don’t worry if you haven’t seen the previous films because this one is a stand-alone film that is loosely based on the Silent Hill 2 video game.

The film opens with young artist James Sunderland (Jeremy Irvine – War Horse) almost running over Mary Crane (Hannah Emily Anderson – X:Men – Dark Phoenix) while she waits for a bus high on a cliff top above her home town, Silent Hill.

He goes to help her and the chemistry between them is instant. A relationship starts and then years later James finds himself apart from her but finds a letter from Mary asking him to come back and find her.

He travels back to Silent Hill and discovers that it is very different place. It looks like an apocalypse has happened. Ash falls from the sky nearly constantly while mutated creatures walk through the streets. Humans are scarce and the ones he does come across seem both physically and mentally damaged.

Still James continues to search for Mary but there are also many questions that need to be answered. Who is the mysterious psychiatrist, known only as M (Nicola Alexis – Dune: Prophecy), who constantly tells James that Mary is dead, and how does the mysterious cult from Jame’s memories of Mary factor into her disappearance.

Whether you love or hate Return To Silent Hill is going to come down to how you feel about films that are a ‘little different’. While most will look at the film and think that it will be a piece of commercial pulp style wise it takes on all the artistic traits of an European arthouse film as Gans lets the audience explore this decimated city just as James is.

As the plot slowly meanders on with very little dialogue in patches and we are introduced to a myriad of creatures and mutants that now call Silent Hill home you could be excused for thinking you are watching an art installation or that Christophe Gans is auditioning to start directing black metal band’s video clips.

While that style might confuse and alienate some of the audience is does match with the game play of the original video game. I do have to admit though that the film itself does seem to work better during its flash-backs and really only comes to life during the present day scenes with the introduction of Maria as a character.

Still the boring parts of the film are largely over-shadowed by the audience’s curiosity. Once you begin this journey with James you will find that you want to stick with it to the end. You simply must have the answers to the all the questions and to the credit while it is done in a roundabout way every question is answered and I must admit the film’s ending is fairly fulfilling.

The various creatures that are revealed in Silent Hill are also amazingly creative but it does feel that they are never fully utilised throughout the film – to the point that I don’t think I ever felt like they posed a threat to James as well.

What does hold up throughout the film though is the performance of Jeremy Irvine. He basically carries this film from start to finish with a performance that actually makes him one of the most memorable things about the film. At times he has to portray his emotions to the audience without dialogue and he does that with ease – something that would have been made harder by the fact that most of the time he would have been reacting to a green screen.

Some may feel that Return To Silent Hill just looks like a creepy screensaver while others may choose to embrace the films artistic side. Either way I get the feeling this will become a cult classic that is very likely to divide audiences over its merit.

The Legend Of Bela Lugosi

By Cinema

The Man Who Became Dracula

Bela Lugosi was born Béla Ferenc Dezső Blaskó on October 20, 1882, in the small town of Lugos in the Kingdom of Hungary, now Lugoj in modern-day Romania. The town itself would later become inseparable from his identity, because “Lugosi” literally means “from Lugos.” Long before he became cinema’s most famous vampire, he came from a rigid, conservative household shaped by discipline, religion, and the social tensions of late 19th century Eastern Europe.

His father, István Blaskó, worked as a banker and expected strict obedience from his children. Accounts from those who knew Bela later in life suggest the relationship was tense and authoritarian. Bela did not grow up in an artistic or bohemian environment. The family valued structure, respectability, and hard work. His mother, Paula de Vojnich, reportedly provided more warmth and emotional balance inside the home, but the household overall was still deeply traditional. Bela was the youngest of four children, and from an early age he showed signs of rebellion against authority.

The Hungary Bela grew up in was politically unstable beneath the surface. National identity, class division, and social unrest simmered throughout the Austro-Hungarian Empire. These tensions would later shape his politics and worldview. As a child, however, Bela was more interested in imagination and performance than academics. He disliked school and reportedly struggled with formal education. He eventually left school as a teenager, which deeply disappointed his father.

One of the most important aspects of Lugosi’s childhood was his fascination with storytelling and theatre. In the late 1800s, traveling theatrical productions moved through towns across Hungary and Transylvania, bringing melodrama, folklore, gothic literature, and romantic tragedy to rural audiences. Young Bela became obsessed with these productions. The theatricality that later defined Dracula was rooted in these early experiences. He admired actors not simply for fame, but because they seemed larger than life. Theatre represented escape from the constraints of his upbringing.

As a teenager he ran away from home several times. This was not a symbolic act of teenage rebellion. It was literal. He wanted independence and refused to accept the path his father envisioned for him. During these years he worked odd jobs including factory labor and mining work. The physical hardship mattered because it gave him an outsider mentality he carried throughout his life. Unlike many polished stage actors of the era who came from privilege or formal education, Lugosi built himself from almost nothing.

There is also an important regional influence that shaped his future image. Lugosi grew up geographically close to the region associated with vampire folklore and superstition. Even though Dracula was an Irish invention by Bram Stoker, Western audiences later connected Lugosi’s accent and Eastern European background with “authentic” gothic mystery. As a child, Bela would have grown up hearing local legends, folk stories, and rural superstitions common throughout Hungary and Transylvania. Death rituals, religious imagery, and fear of the supernatural were woven into everyday life in many villages during that era. This atmosphere later became part of his screen presence even if indirectly.

By his late teens he was already gravitating toward acting troupes and small theatre companies. He adopted the stage surname “Lugosi” as a way of reinventing himself and tying his identity to his birthplace. Reinvention became a recurring theme throughout his life. Bela Lugosi was not born as the aristocratic, hypnotic figure audiences later saw onscreen. He constructed that identity piece by piece through ambition, performance, and survival.

His difficult childhood also left emotional scars. Throughout adulthood, Lugosi often seemed caught between pride and insecurity. He desperately wanted recognition as a serious actor, not merely a horror novelty. Many biographers trace this tension back to his early life, where approval was difficult to earn and rebellion came with consequences.

What makes Bela Lugosi’s childhood so compelling is how unlikely his eventual rise truly was. A boy from a strict provincial Hungarian family, with limited education and few advantages, would eventually become one of the most recognizable faces in horror history. Yet even at the height of fame, traces of that young outsider from Lugos never disappeared. The accent remained. The intensity remained. The hunger to transform himself remained. Those elements began long before Dracula ever stepped from the shadows.

Bela Lugosi’s path into film was anything but immediate. Before Hollywood ever discovered him, he spent years on the Hungarian stage developing the dramatic intensity that later became his trademark. In the early 1900s he worked with regional theatre companies before eventually earning roles at the National Theatre of Hungary, a significant achievement for someone with little formal education. He performed in classical dramas and romantic roles, often playing soldiers, aristocrats, or emotionally tortured men. At this stage there was no indication he would become permanently associated with horror.

His earliest film appearances came during the silent era in Hungary around 1917. These films are largely lost today, but they showed Lugosi experimenting with cinema at a time when motion pictures were still developing as an art form. He appeared in romantic dramas, adventure stories, and patriotic productions during World War I. The collapse of the Austro-Hungarian Empire and political turmoil following the war changed everything. Lugosi became involved in actors’ unions and political activism during the short-lived Hungarian Soviet Republic of 1919. When the government fell, many associated with it faced persecution. Lugosi fled Hungary and spent time in Germany before eventually immigrating to the United States in the early 1920s.

America was not immediately welcoming. Lugosi arrived speaking very little English and had to rebuild his career from scratch. He worked in immigrant theatre circles, particularly among Hungarian-speaking communities in New York. His heavy accent, which later became legendary, initially limited opportunities in mainstream productions. Yet the very thing Hollywood viewed as a problem eventually became his greatest weapon.

The breakthrough came on stage rather than film. In 1927 Lugosi was cast in the Broadway adaptation of Bram Stoker’s Dracula. His performance stunned audiences. He played the Count not as a snarling monster but as an elegant predator. Calm. Hypnotic. Controlled. He used stillness and voice in ways that felt unsettlingly intimate. Critics and audiences became fascinated with him. The production ran for hundreds of performances and turned Lugosi into a sensation.

Universal Pictures eventually adapted Dracula into film in 1931. Lugosi desperately wanted the role but studio executives initially hesitated. They considered him too foreign and not well known enough for a major production. Some accounts suggest he even accepted a relatively small salary just to secure the part. The gamble changed horror cinema forever.

Dracula (1931) became one of the defining films of the Universal monster era. Directed by Tod Browning, the film was atmospheric, theatrical, and strange compared to later horror movies. Lugosi dominated it completely. His thick Hungarian accent, piercing stare, formal movements, and measured delivery created a vampire unlike anything audiences had seen before. Lines such as “I never drink… wine” became immortal largely because of how he delivered them. The cape, slicked-back hair, medallion, and aristocratic demeanor all became foundational vampire imagery for generations afterward.

The success of Dracula should have made Lugosi a major Hollywood star across many genres, but the industry quickly trapped him inside horror and “foreign villain” roles. Studios saw him less as a versatile actor and more as a novelty. Lugosi resisted this typecasting because he considered himself a serious dramatic performer. Nevertheless, horror kept pulling him back.

In Murders in the Rue Morgue (1932), he played the deranged Dr. Mirakle, a scientist obsessed with grotesque experiments involving apes and human blood. The film allowed Lugosi to lean into madness and theatricality. White Zombie (1932) followed soon after and became one of the earliest feature-length zombie films ever made. Lugosi played Murder Legendre, a sinister voodoo master controlling the dead through hypnotic power. His wide-eyed performance remains one of the eeriest of his career and heavily influenced later horror villains.

Throughout the 1930s Lugosi became one of Universal’s defining horror faces alongside Boris Karloff. The two actors were often presented as rivals, though reality was more complicated. Karloff generally received stronger scripts and more prestigious productions after Frankenstein became a massive success. Lugosi reportedly resented this imbalance. He had famously rejected the Frankenstein monster role because he disliked the idea of heavy makeup and mute performance. That decision haunted him for years because Karloff’s career exploded afterward.

The studio paired the two men together in several films including The Black Cat (1934), The Raven (1935), and Son of Frankenstein (1939). These movies became landmarks of gothic horror. The Black Cat in particular stands out because it feels psychologically dark and unusually modern for its time. Lugosi plays a deeply traumatized man seeking revenge against Karloff’s satanic architect. Their onscreen chemistry created tension that audiences loved.

By the late 1930s and early 1940s, however, Lugosi’s career had begun declining. Horror films themselves were increasingly viewed by studios as lower-budget entertainment. Lugosi often found himself in weaker productions with limited resources. Yet even in lesser films, he brought intensity and dignity to roles that could easily have become ridiculous.

One of his strongest late performances came in The Wolf Man (1941), where he played the gypsy Bela who passes the curse of lycanthropy onto Lon Chaney Jr.’s character. He later appeared as Frankenstein’s monster in Frankenstein Meets the Wolf Man (1943), though much of his dialogue was cut from the final film, leaving the performance awkwardly misunderstood by audiences for decades.

Outside Universal, Lugosi worked constantly because he needed money. Financial problems, career frustration, and chronic pain eventually contributed to a morphine addiction after being prescribed medication for leg injuries and exhaustion. By the early 1950s he was no longer viewed as a major star by Hollywood, though horror fans still adored him.

His final chapter became permanently tied to director Ed Wood. Wood worshipped Lugosi and saw him not as a washed-up relic but as a genuine legend. Together they made films including Glen or Glenda (1953), Bride of the Monster (1955), and footage later used in Plan 9 from Outer Space. These productions were chaotic and low-budget, but they gave Lugosi something Hollywood had largely denied him in later years: affection and central importance.

When Bela Lugosi died in 1956 at age 73, he was buried wearing one of his Dracula capes. Whether chosen by family or inspired by legend, the image became symbolic of his entire life. He spent decades trying to escape Dracula’s shadow, yet ultimately the role made him immortal. Long after many technically “greater” actors faded from public memory, Lugosi endured because he created something timeless. He did not simply play Dracula. For millions of people, he became Dracula.

Bela Lugosi’s struggles with drug addiction were tragic, complicated, and deeply tied to both physical pain and the collapse of his Hollywood career. By the time the public became fully aware of his addiction in the 1950s, Lugosi was already a fading star carrying years of frustration, financial pressure, and emotional isolation.

The addiction centered primarily around morphine and later methadone. Unlike many Hollywood addiction stories built around partying or excess, Lugosi’s began through medical treatment. During the 1930s and 1940s he suffered from chronic pain, reportedly linked to severe sciatica and leg injuries sustained over years of physically demanding stage work and film productions. Doctors prescribed painkillers, which at the time were handed out far more casually than they would be today.

What started as pain management slowly became dependence.

Hollywood itself did little to help him. After Dracula made him famous in 1931, Lugosi expected a career filled with major dramatic roles. Instead, studios increasingly treated him as a horror novelty. He watched Boris Karloff rise to prestige status while he himself became trapped in low-budget horror films and stereotyped foreign villain roles. Lugosi took this personally. Friends and biographers later described him as proud, sensitive, and deeply aware that Hollywood no longer respected him.

By the late 1940s the work had dried up significantly. He was earning far less money than audiences probably assumed. At times he accepted almost any role available simply to survive financially. Many of the productions were exploitative and cheaply made. For an actor who once commanded Broadway stages and helped redefine horror cinema, the decline was emotionally brutal.

The addiction worsened during these years. Lugosi reportedly hid the extent of it from many people around him. Unlike alcohol addiction, which often played out publicly in Hollywood circles, morphine dependence could remain hidden behind exhaustion, mood swings, or erratic behavior. There were periods where Lugosi seemed functional and articulate, followed by stretches where he appeared frail and physically diminished.

One important thing often overlooked is that Lugosi still maintained a remarkable level of professionalism despite his struggles. Co-stars frequently noted that he remained polite, theatrical, and committed to performances even when productions themselves were disastrous. He still carried himself with the elegance and old-world formality that had defined him since the Dracula years.

His addiction became public knowledge in 1955 when he voluntarily entered treatment at the Metropolitan State Hospital in California. This was a major moment because celebrity addiction was rarely discussed openly during that era. Lugosi’s decision to seek help publicly required courage. Newspapers covered the story heavily, often with a mix of sympathy and sensationalism. Some articles portrayed him almost like a fallen gothic figure, blurring the line between the man and the Dracula persona that had followed him for decades.

After treatment, Lugosi genuinely tried to rebuild himself. He appeared on television interviews speaking candidly about recovery. In one famous appearance he openly acknowledged his addiction in front of a national audience, something very unusual for the mid-1950s. There was vulnerability in these moments that audiences had rarely seen from him before.

Around this same period he continued working with Ed Wood, the eccentric filmmaker who idolized him. Their relationship has often been misunderstood or mocked because of the bizarre nature of Wood’s films, but there was genuine loyalty between them. Wood gave Lugosi work when much of Hollywood had abandoned him. Lugosi, in turn, seemed grateful simply to still be performing.

Sadly, his health continued declining. Years of addiction, stress, financial instability, and aging had taken a severe toll. Bela Lugosi died of a heart attack on August 16, 1956, at the age of 73.

One reason Lugosi’s addiction story still resonates is because it feels inseparable from the darker side of old Hollywood itself. He was a pioneering immigrant actor who created one of cinema’s most enduring icons, yet the industry often discarded him once it no longer knew how to market him. The morphine addiction became part of a larger narrative about isolation, typecasting, physical suffering, and the psychological cost of fame.

Even so, his legacy survived far beyond those final difficult years. Modern audiences tend to remember the hypnotic stare, the cape, the accent, and the elegance. But behind that image was a man who spent much of his life fighting to retain dignity in an industry that repeatedly reduced him to a caricature of his own success.